Tesla T10 Processor vs Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1068not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeGT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)9 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192240
Core clock speedno data610 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 9 April 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 188 Watt

R4 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 7 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1153.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) and Tesla T10 Processor. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while Tesla T10 Processor is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
Tesla T10 Processor

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 123 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 17 votes

Rate Tesla T10 Processor on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.