GeForce G210 OEM vs Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1133not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.48no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeG96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)26 May 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19216
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0432 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data504 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.064 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 26 May 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 31 Watt

R4 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 7 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce G210 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce G210 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
GeForce G210 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 128 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 74 votes

Rate GeForce G210 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) or GeForce G210 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.