GeForce 9500M GE vs Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1119 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.39 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | no data |
| GPU code name | Stoney Ridge | MCP79Mx + NB9M |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 9 January 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 10.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 9 January 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
R4 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 8 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce 9500M GE. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
