GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1133not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.43no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeGT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)13 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19216
Core clock speedno data589 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.712
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 13 June 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

R4 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 128 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) or GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.