ATI FireGL V7100 vs Radeon R4 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameBeemaR480
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 June 2014 (11 years ago)1 December 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed800 MHz507 MHz
Number of transistors930 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt91 Watt
Texture fill rate6.4006.084
Floating-point processing power0.2048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs412
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data211 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared520 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data33.28 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 June 2014 1 December 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 91 Watt

R4 Graphics has an age advantage of 9 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 506.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R4 Graphics and FireGL V7100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R4 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Radeon R4 Graphics
ATI FireGL V7100
FireGL V7100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1348 votes

Rate Radeon R4 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R4 Graphics or FireGL V7100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.