ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs R3E Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.89
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBeemaRV620
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)25 February 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12840
Core clock speed351 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors930 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8082.376
Floating-point processing power0.08986 TFLOPS0.04752 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared396 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.336 GB/s
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 25 February 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

R3E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4250, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics and Radeon HD 4250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 86 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics or Radeon HD 4250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.