RTX A2000 12 GB vs Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.28
Power efficiencyno data36.00
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBeemaGA106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)23 November 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1283328
Core clock speed351 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors930 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate2.808124.8
Floating-point processing power0.08986 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A2000 12 GB has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 43% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics and RTX A2000 12 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 10 votes

Rate Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 171 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics or RTX A2000 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.