GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBeemaGF110
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)6 June 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128512
Core clock speed351 MHz772 MHz
Number of transistors930 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt244 Watt
Texture fill rate2.80849.41
Floating-point processing power0.08986 TFLOPS1.581 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs864
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1536 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 6 June 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 244 Watt

R3E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 3 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 144% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics and GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics or GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.