GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.89
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBeemaGF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)15 March 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128192
Core clock speed351 MHz783 MHz
Number of transistors930 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate2.80825.06
Floating-point processing power0.08986 TFLOPS0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared902 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.73 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 15 March 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 106 Watt

R3E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 42 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics or GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.