GeForce 8600 GT vs Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.54
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBeemaG84
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (10 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12832
Core clock speed351 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors930 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8088.640
Floating-point processing power0.08986 TFLOPS0.07616 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Standard memory config per GPUno data256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 47 Watt

R3E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

8600 GT, on the other hand, has 112.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics and GeForce 8600 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8600 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
GeForce 8600 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1081 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics or GeForce 8600 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.