ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256 vs Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameBeemaR300
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed351 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors930 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8082.600
Floating-point processing power0.08986 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 37 Watt

R3E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256, on the other hand, has 170% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics and FireGL 9700 X1-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while FireGL 9700 X1-256 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics or FireGL 9700 X1-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.