GeForce 9200M vs Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.20
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBeemaC79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 January 2015 (10 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12816
Core clock speed600 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHzno data
Number of transistors930 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8003.600
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

R3 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 51 votes

Rate Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.