ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 vs Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBeemaRV635
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)28 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128120
Core clock speed600 MHz722 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHzno data
Number of transistors930 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8005.776
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS0.1733 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data232 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared594 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.01 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 28 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

R3 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 6 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics and All-In-Wonder HD 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650
All-In-Wonder HD 3650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 51 votes

Rate Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics or All-In-Wonder HD 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.