RTX A5500 Mobile vs Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.05
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBeemaGA103
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date28 January 2015 (10 years ago)22 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1287424
Core clock speed497 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors930 million22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate3.976348.0
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS22.27 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 22 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 165 Watt

R2 Mobile Graphics has 65% lower power consumption.

RTX A5500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics and RTX A5500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 61 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 19 votes

Rate RTX A5500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics or RTX A5500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.