Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.61
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBeemaTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128896
Core clock speed497 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors930 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.97675.60
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics and Quadro T1000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 61 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics or Quadro T1000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.