RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1094not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.76no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1283072
Core clock speedno data1530 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2010 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data193.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.35 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data96
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 37 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.