GeForce RTX 4010 vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1162not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.84no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128768
Core clock speedno data1417 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.29
Floating-point processing powerno data2.706 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4010, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce RTX 4010. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4010 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010
GeForce RTX 4010

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 41 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 27 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) or GeForce RTX 4010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.