GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1171not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.86no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeG92B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)1 July 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128112
Core clock speedno data675 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors3100 Million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data37.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3629 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data70.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 1 July 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 6 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce GTS 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTS 240 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
GeForce GTS 240 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 42 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 38 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) or GeForce GTS 240 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.