GeForce GT 1030 GK107 vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1102not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.71no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)30 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128384
Core clock speedno data1058 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors3100 Million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data33.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data147 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 30 September 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has 333.3% lower power consumption.

GT 1030 GK107, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce GT 1030 GK107. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while GeForce GT 1030 GK107 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
GeForce GT 1030 GK107

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 84 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 GK107 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.