GMA 3000 vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1101not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.71no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeBroadwater
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3000, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and GMA 3000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Intel GMA 3000
GMA 3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 45 votes

Rate GMA 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.