Extreme Graphics 2 vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1110not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Generation 2.0 (2002−2003)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeMontara
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)3 December 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speedno data200 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz266 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.27
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)7.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 3 December 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and Extreme Graphics 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Intel Extreme Graphics 2
Extreme Graphics 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 14 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) or Extreme Graphics 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.