Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs R2 Graphics
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | Beema | Navi 31 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 February 2015 (10 years ago) | 13 April 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,499 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 4480 |
| Core clock speed | 351 MHz | 1895 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2525 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 930 million | 57,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 281 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.808 | 707.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.08986 TFLOPS | 45.25 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 128 |
| TMUs | 8 | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 70 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 2.2 MB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 6 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 96 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 280 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 864.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 February 2015 | 13 April 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 281 Watt |
R2 Graphics has 1773.3% lower power consumption.
PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 Graphics and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R2 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
