B200 vs Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameBeemaGB100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 February 2016 (10 years ago)2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6418944 ×2
Core clock speed497 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1965 MHz
Number of transistors930 million104,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate3.9761,163.3 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.06362 TFLOPS74.45 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs424 ×2
TMUs8592 ×2
Tensor Coresno data592 ×2
L1 Cacheno data37 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared90 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.1 TB/s ×2
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.5 (6.0)N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.2.170N/A
CUDA-10.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 1000 Watt

R1E Mobile Graphics has 6567% lower power consumption.

B200, on the other hand, has a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics and B200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while B200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate B200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics or B200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.