Arc 140T Mobile vs Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameBeemaArrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 February 2016 (9 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores641024
Core clock speed497 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors930 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.976150.4
Floating-point processing power0.06362 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (6.0)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2016 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

R1E Mobile Graphics has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Arc 140T Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.