ATI Mobility FireGL V3200 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking464not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code namePolaris 22M24
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date24 April 2018 (7 years ago)1 June 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12806
Core clock speed931 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate80.881.600
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0b
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2018 1 June 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

Pro WX Vega M GL has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Mobility FireGL V3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
ATI Mobility FireGL V3200
Mobility FireGL V3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL or Mobility FireGL V3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.