H100 CNX vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking439not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.47no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 22GH100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date24 April 2018 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128014592
Core clock speed931 MHz690 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1845 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88841.3
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS53.84 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs80456
Tensor Coresno data456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB80 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-9.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2018 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 350 Watt

Pro WX Vega M GL has 438.5% lower power consumption.

H100 CNX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and H100 CNX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation graphics card while H100 CNX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIA H100 CNX
H100 CNX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate H100 CNX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL or H100 CNX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.