GeForce 6100 + nForce 420 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.03no data
Power efficiency10.12no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10C61
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)11 October 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1200 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate336.00.43
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs2241
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 11 October 2004
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Pro WX 8200 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 8200 and GeForce 6100 + nForce 420. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 6100 + nForce 420 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 420
GeForce 6100 + nForce 420

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce 6100 nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8200 or GeForce 6100 + nForce 420, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.