ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking211not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.65no data
Power efficiency10.08no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameVega 10RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)1 July 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate336.01.600
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs2244
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 1 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm

Pro WX 8200 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 8200 and All-In-Wonder X600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X600 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8200 or All-In-Wonder X600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.