RTX PRO 6000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8100

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVega 10GB202
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 December 2017 (7 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358424064
Core clock speed1200 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate336.01,810
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs64176
TMUs224752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB96 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 600 Watt

Pro WX 8100 has 160.9% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 8100 and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8100 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.