Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs Pro WX 7100
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 332 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.19 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.93 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 November 2016 (9 years ago) | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 3584 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | 852 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 179.0 | 224.0 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.728 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 144 | 224 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s ×2 |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.125 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 November 2016 | 29 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 230 Watt |
Pro WX 7100 has 77% lower power consumption.
Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 7100 and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
