Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP vs Pro WX 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.58no data
Power efficiency13.41no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameEllesmereKalindi
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 November 2016 (9 years ago)1 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792128
Core clock speed713 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1086 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate121.63.200
Floating-point processing power3.892 TFLOPS0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1128
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 November 2016 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

Pro WX 5100 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8240 Mobile IGP, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon Pro WX 5100
AMD Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 103 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 5100 or Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.