ATI Graphics Ultra Pro vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking415not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.59no data
Power efficiency13.46no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code nameEllesmereMach32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 November 2016 (9 years ago)1 January 1993 (32 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed713 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1086 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate121.6no data
Floating-point processing power3.892 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16VLB
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5VRAM
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s80.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)None
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.0None
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 November 2016 1 January 1993
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 800 nm

Pro WX 5100 has an age advantage of 23 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 5614.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon Pro WX 5100
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 103 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 5100 or Graphics Ultra Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.