Radeon R9 390X2 vs Pro WX 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN (2012−2015)
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno data512
Memory bus widthno data5400 Bit

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno dataGDDR5

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4200 and Radeon R9 390X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 390X2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 37 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4200 or Radeon R9 390X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.