ATI Radeon X1950 XT AGP vs Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking511not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.40no data
Power efficiency13.45no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameBaffinR580+
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)17 October 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1125 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt96 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8610.00
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs6416
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz703 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s44.99 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 17 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 96 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 92% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Radeon X1950 XT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1950 XT AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
ATI Radeon X1950 XT AGP
Radeon X1950 XT AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 51 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1950 XT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or Radeon X1950 XT AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.