Radeon HD 7350 PCI vs Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking511not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.43no data
Power efficiency13.41no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameBaffinCedar
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)5 January 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102480
Core clock speed1125 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate76.865.200
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 5 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 19 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7350 PCI, on the other hand, has 163.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Radeon HD 7350 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7350 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Radeon HD 7350 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 51 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 53 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7350 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or Radeon HD 7350 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.