Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking426not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.03no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameBaffinTU106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2016 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$711 (1.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241920
Core clock speed1125 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1201 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate76.86165.6
Floating-point performance2,460 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDAno data7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 80 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 42 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.