Radeon Pro WX 3200: specs and benchmarks
Aggregated performance score
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 6.27% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Summary
AMD started Radeon Pro WX 3200 sales 26 September 2019 at a recommended price of $199 . This is a Polaris architecture desktop card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 6 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 64 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x8 interface. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 65 Watt.
General info
Some basic facts about Radeon Pro WX 3200: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in performance ranking | 542 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Value for money | 3.15 | |
| Architecture | Polaris (2016−2019) | |
| GPU code name | Polaris 12 | |
| Market segment | Workstation | |
| Release date | 26 September 2019 (4 years old) | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Current price | $740 (3.7x MSRP) | of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon Pro WX 3200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Number of transistors | 2,200 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | of 4 (Radeon 780M) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 41.44 | of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB) |
Size and compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Width | MXM Module | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon Pro WX 3200: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | of 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | of 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | of 3276 (Aldebaran) |
| Shared memory | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon Pro WX 3200. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API support
APIs supported by Radeon Pro WX 3200, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon Pro WX 3200. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
Benchmark coverage: 2%
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
Benchmark coverage: 2%
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
Benchmark coverage: 2%
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
Benchmark coverage: 2%
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
Benchmark coverage: 2%
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
Benchmark coverage: 2%
SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
Benchmark coverage: 2%
SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Send your test results of Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Radeon Pro WX 3200 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 19 | |
| 4K | 8 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 20 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | |
| Hitman 3 | 14−16 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 18 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | |
| Hitman 3 | 14−16 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14 | |
| Metro Exodus | 10 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 15 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 17 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10 |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
| Hitman 3 | 10−11 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14 | |
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3 |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | |
| Hitman 3 | 6−7 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 8−9 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon Pro WX 3200 is GRID K240Q, which is faster by 5% and higher by 11 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro WX 3200:
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Radeon Pro WX 3200 according to our statistics.
