GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh vs Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)6 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402048
Boost clock speed1967 MHz1492 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate472.195.49
Floating-point performanceno data6.111 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s144.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 4x ThunderboltNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2021 6 July 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 75 Watt

Pro W6800X Duo has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 39 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 48 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.