Radeon RX 640 OEM vs Pro W6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking77not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.66no data
Power efficiency14.85no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 21Polaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 June 2021 (4 years ago)9 April 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840640
Core clock speed2075 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2320 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate556.851.80
Floating-point processing power17.82 TFLOPS1.658 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs24040
Ray Tracing Cores60no data
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB160 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.4a, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2021 9 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Pro W6800 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

RX 640 OEM, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800 and Radeon RX 640 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 640 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 86 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 26 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6800 or Radeon RX 640 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.