Radeon 520 OEM vs Pro W6800
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 76 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.96 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.67 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | Navi 21 | Banks |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 June 2021 (4 years ago) | 18 April 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,249 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2320 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 26,800 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 556.8 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 17.82 TFLOPS | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 8 |
| TMUs | 240 | 20 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 (5.1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.170 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 June 2021 | 18 April 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
Pro W6800 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
520 OEM, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800 and Radeon 520 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 520 OEM is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
