P30PH vs Radeon Pro W6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking75not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.86no data
Power efficiency14.86no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 21Polaris 20
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 June 2021 (4 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$2,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402048
Core clock speed2075 MHz1120 MHz
Boost clock speed2320 MHz1206 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate556.8154.4
Floating-point processing power17.82 TFLOPS4.94 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs240128
Ray Tracing Cores60no data
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2100 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s268.8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.0b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 180 Watt

Pro W6800 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

P30PH, on the other hand, has 38.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800 and P30PH. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Radeon Pro W6800
AMD P30PH
P30PH

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 86 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 6 votes

Rate P30PH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6800 or P30PH, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.