Xbox Series S GPU vs Radeon Pro W6600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking197not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.29no data
Power efficiency20.07no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 23Lockhart
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2021 (4 years ago)10 November 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed2068 MHz1565 MHz
Boost clock speed2479 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate317.3125.2
Floating-point processing power10.15 TFLOPS4.006 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12880
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Lengthno data274 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2021 10 November 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 100 Watt

Pro W6600X has an age advantage of 8 months.

Xbox Series S GPU, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6600X and Xbox Series S GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600X is a workstation graphics card while Xbox Series S GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
Radeon Pro W6600X
AMD Xbox Series S GPU
Xbox Series S GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 987 votes

Rate Xbox Series S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600X or Xbox Series S GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.