ATI Radeon X300 vs Pro W6600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking197not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.81no data
Power efficiency20.12no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 23RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2021 (4 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed2068 MHz375 MHz
Boost clock speed2479 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt36 Watt
Texture fill rate317.31.500
Floating-point processing power10.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1284
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2021 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 36 Watt

Pro W6600X has an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1471% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300, on the other hand, has 233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6600X and Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600X is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X300 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 41 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600X or Radeon X300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.