ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs Pro W6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking309not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency31.02no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameNavi 24R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (4 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed2331 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed2331 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,400 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate111.93.040
Floating-point processing power3.58 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs488
Ray Tracing Cores12no data
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s21.76 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 47 Watt

Pro W6400 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6400 and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6400 or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.