GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs Radeon Pro W6400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking264not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.53no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76814080
Core clock speed2331 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speed2331 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate111.91,148
Floating-point processing power3.58 TFLOPS73.5 TFLOPS
ROPs32144
TMUs48440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Cores12110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1325 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s678.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 400 Watt

Pro W6400 has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Ti, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6400 and GeForce RTX 4080 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 679 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.