GeForce RTX 4010 vs Radeon Pro W6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking308not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.95no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 24GA107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (3 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed2331 MHz1417 MHz
Boost clock speed2331 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate111.942.29
Floating-point processing power3.58 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4824
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Cores126
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB768 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm

Pro W6400 has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 4010, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6400 and GeForce RTX 4010. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4010 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010
GeForce RTX 4010

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 30 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 30 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6400 or GeForce RTX 4010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.