Arc Pro A50 vs Radeon Pro W6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking261not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Boost clock speed2331 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate111.9150.4
Floating-point performance3.58 gflops4.813 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed14 GB/s16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

Pro W6400 has 50% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6400 and Arc Pro A50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Pro A50 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400
Intel Arc Pro A50
Arc Pro A50

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro A50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.