ATI Radeon 7200 vs Pro W5700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.43no data
Power efficiency13.20no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 10R100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 November 2019 (4 years ago)1 April 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1243 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate277.91
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1446

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W5700 15038
+751800%
ATI 7200 2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2019 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 23 Watt

Pro W5700 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 791.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 92 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.