ATI FireGL 8800 vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking167not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.65no data
Power efficiency12.66no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 10R200
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 November 2019 (6 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1243 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Wattno data
Texture fill rate277.92.400
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1448
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz290 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s9.28 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2019 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

Pro W5700 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5700 and FireGL 8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
ATI FireGL 8800
FireGL 8800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate FireGL 8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700 or FireGL 8800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.