Tesla S1070 vs Radeon Pro W5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking293not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.69no data
Power efficiency13.12no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 14GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $7,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408240 ×4
Core clock speed1187 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate123.248.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs3232 ×4
TMUs8880 ×4
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 800 Watt

Pro W5500 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 540% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500 and Tesla S1070. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
NVIDIA Tesla S1070
Tesla S1070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 89 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Tesla S1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500 or Tesla S1070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.